Thursday, May 1, 2014

The Coaches Coach: Drawing Distinctions – Operative and Speculative


Good Day My Fellow Travelers,

Here's an article published in February 2014 based upon my upcoming book, "Building Free Men - Uncommonly Freeing Masonic Education - Volume 8", due out in about 2 months that might be of interest to you. 

Fraternally and Sincerely,

Bro. John S. Nagy
Building Better Builders Series Author

________________
 
The Coaches Coach: Drawing Distinctions – Operative and Speculative
 

When you rely solely upon what others tell you, you risk knowing only what little you are told.
 
I’ve come across enough instances where the use of words was so twisted off course that the meaning behind their original intent was no longer recognizable.  Such instances occur regularly in life and, not surprisingly, within the Freemasonic Organization.  These instances can often appear overwhelming and certainly disconcerting, especially to those who enter into Freemasonry’s knowledge game with the preconceived notion that what is shared within its hallowed halls is complete, factual and unwavering.  Such is the case with the words associated with Operation and Speculation as used within the Fraternity.  Should you accept without waver what is offered by your Brothers, further scrutiny of these words shall neither occur, nor bring fresh Light to shuttered eyes.
________________
 
When I Entered the ranks of the Fraternal Order, I was led to believe that I was now part of “Speculative” Masonry only, not Operative Masonry in any way and my Brothers reinforced this division.  I was further told the distinction between the two had to do with their focuses and activities.  I was moreover informed that Operative Masons were those individuals who plied their trade upon physical stones only. Speculative Masons, on the other hand, erect a spiritual temple, a house not made by hand, eternal in the heavens.  It was implied that the division between the two had to do with physical versus mental work.
 
Soon thereafter I earned the right to Travel, I quickly became aware that there were some very different definitions used outside of the Fraternity associated with the words used within the phrases that differentiated modern day Freemasons and Masons who existed as members prior to Grand Lodge Era.  These differences were startling.
 
As time unfolded, I noticed a continuous decline in member participation within the craft over the relatively short time that I was part of the organization.   I began asking myself and others if we were missing something in our instructions that might provide a clue to this decline.  Was there something in our training that was not being conveyed that should be?  Did we somehow miss an important aspect of the Craft that brought upon us the very decline that we wanted to avoid?  I was sure that there was something, but I was not clear as to what it was.
 
Speculation
 
My search for answers to these questions led me to look into the very words put before me and many other Brothers during Instruction.  One of many words I started examining was the word, “speculative”.  At first, my search led me to definitions and I didn’t like what I found.  As the word, “speculative[i]” is defined today, it means, “engaged in, expressing, or based on conjecture rather than knowledge.”  This definition had me scratching my head.  I didn’t like the phrase “rather than knowledge”, especially since it was Light that attracted me to the Organization.  I also took the time to look up the word, “conjecture[ii]”, since I was now questioning a lot of things including what I thought I knew.
 
The definition for the word, “conjecture”, provided me with very little comfort.  In fact, it was quite disquieting!  It said that a conjecture was “an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information” and it was the opposite of “fact”.  Surely this was not what was behind the meaning of “speculative”!  Surely this disturbing definition was not behind why so many Brothers knew so little about the role that speculation was supposed to play in their own lives!  Rattled, I dug deeper.
 
Going into the etymology of the word, “speculative[iii]”, provided some much needed comfort and relief.  It said that it originally meant, “purely scientific [iv], in theory only”.  I could easily embrace that.  The etymology also said to look at “speculation[v]”, and so I did.  I found it meant, “intelligent contemplation, consideration; act of looking”.  I liked that phrase, “intelligent contemplation”.  I knew what being contemplative[vi] meant, or at least, what it meant to me.
 
Stepping back from the quarry dig, I realized the word, “speculative”, had undergone a tremendous shift in meaning over the years.  Much like the words, “Mason” and “Freemason[vii]”, its general use today reveals it had gone through a semantic shift and doesn’t mean what it did many years ago.  Its originally meaning denoted, “prolonged theoretical thought”, and connoted, “the liberal arts as opposed to the ‘mechanic’ arts (i.e., arts requiring manual skill)”.  It is clear that the intent of the word, “speculative”, was not to engage in unfounded thinking but to use it as a bridging metaphor for building toward the application of techniques used to “build builders of men” by way of the liberal arts study rather than the manual arts.  In essence, Speculative Masons are supposed to be “Well-Founded Cultivated Thinkers”.  Such Cultivation doesn’t occur without Operative elements.  This means it requires Work!
 
Operation
 
Eventually, I operated consciously and deliberately away from speculativism[viii], I turned my attention to the word, “operative[ix], [x]”.  The word appeared to be straightforward in its definition:  functioning, having effect; a worker. Further investigation revealed that not much had changed in its overall meaning over time, other than wider applications.  What were more telling to me though were the archaic meanings and roots:  done by labor; creative; formative.  Its antonym was “invalid”, affirming the lack of results that non-operation would bring forth should one not engage oneself actively in one’s endeavors.  These pieces all dove-tailed very nicely with the slogan that I heard years before I joined the Organization of Free and Accepted Masons: Masonry Makes Good Men Better.  Or, as I have said many times before: No Work, No Transformation!
 
Further speculation into the label that Speculative members put forth to differentiate themselves from their stone carving Brothers brought forth an interesting question.  If Operative members of the Organization did all the labor, and Speculative members did all the thinking, wouldn’t the Organization need both functioning together to accomplish anything of significance? 
 
Results
 
The response to this question is that it is not as clean cut and divided a Craft as many members might want to conclude.  Although the labels originally put forth by our Speculative progenitors were done so with the best of intentions, it doesn’t take any deep speculation to quickly realize they do not do justice to the Craft if one assumes and acts as if a separation actually exists:  to accomplish anything of great importance, one must both Speculate and Operate[xi].  Even Rituals today in many different jurisdiction state quite succinctly that “our ancient brethren worked at (wrought in) both Operative and Speculative Masonry[xii].  This makes sense too for anything that Masons diligently Operated upon would have to be backed by well-founded Speculation toward what was to be Built if such activities were to have any lasting value.
 
And, as in ancient times, the same goes for our modern day Brothers.  Rituals say that “…as the Operative Workman Erects his temporal Building…, so should we (“Free and Accepted Masons”), both Operative and Speculative, Endeavor to Erect our Spiritual Building… [xiii]” connoting that both functions must occur, along with the assignment of the labels “Operative and Speculative”, even when the erections that current modern day members strive to bring forth are that of Spiritual Temples. 
 
Unfortunately, creating a division, due to any unfounded Speculative belief that Spiritual Temples require no Operative involvement to bring it forth only confuses the Builders of such temples.  Severing them in twain mistakenly divides one from the other in our current Craft efforts.  This either           1) prevents Building altogether due to lack of Operation, or 2) when such Building goes unguided for lack of well-founded Speculation, only Rubbish ensues.   
 
What’s more, neither of these outcomes are the desired results that any man intent upon Betterment should accept!  As much as Freemasonic Training offers to its members opportunities to think; little to no Work is required.  Masonic Training however requires you to Operate as a Well-Founded Cultivated Thinker; this requires Work!  To obtain Better, Operative and Speculative Functions must unite within you and Work together. 
 
ae))))fb
 
Points to Perpend
 
1.    Do you believe speculation is the only activity required to improve yourself?
2.   If you were to take upon yourself activities that actually “have effect” upon your personal improvement, what would those transformative activities be?
3.   Should you look upon your role in your life as a responsible proactive Speculator and Operator, what do you believe your future activities would include?



[i] speculative (adjective) 1.engaged in, expressing, or based on conjecture rather than knowledge. [synonyms: conjectural, suppositional, theoretical, hypothetical, putative, academic, notional, abstract; tentative, unproven, unfounded, groundless, unsubstantiated]; 2. (of an investment) involving a high risk of loss. [synonyms: risky, hazardous, unsafe, uncertain, unpredictable; informal, chancy, dicey, iffy]
[ii] conjecture (noun) 1. an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information. [synonyms: speculation, guesswork, surmise, fancy, presumption, assumption, theory, postulation, supposition; inference, (an) extrapolation; an estimate; informal, a guesstimate, a shot in the dark, a ballpark figure]; [antonyms: fact]; 2. an unproven mathematical or scientific theorem. 3. (in textual criticism) the suggestion or reconstruction of a reading of a text not present in the original source.
(verb) 1. form an opinion or supposition about (something or someone) on the basis of incomplete information. [synonyms: guess, speculate, surmise, infer, fancy, imagine, believe, think, suspect, presume, assume, hypothesize, suppose];[antonyms: know]; 2. •(in textual criticism) propose (a reading).
Origin: late Middle English (in the senses ‘to divine’ and ‘divination’): from Old French, or from Latin conjectura, from conicere ‘put together in thought,’ from con- ‘together’ + jacere ‘throw.’
[iii] speculative (adjective) late 14c., “contemplative,” also “purely scientific, in theory only” (opposed to practical), from Old French speculatif “worth great attention; theoretical,” or directly from Late Latin speculativus, from past participle stem of speculari (see speculation). Meaning “given to (financial) speculation” is from 1763. Related: Speculatively.
[iv] scientific (adjective)1. based on or characterized by the methods and principles of science. [synonyms: technological, technical; research-based, knowledge-based, empirical]; 2. relating to or used in science. 3. informal: systematic; methodical. [synonyms: systematic, methodical, organized, well-organized, ordered, orderly, meticulous, rigorous; exact, precise, accurate, mathematical; analytical, rational]
Origin: late 16th cent.: from French scientifique or late Latin scientificus ‘producing knowledge,’ from scientia. Early use described the liberal arts as opposed to the “mechanic” arts (i.e., arts requiring manual skill).
[v] speculation: (noun) late 14c., “intelligent contemplation, consideration; act of looking,” from Old French speculacion “close observation, rapt attention,” and directly from Late Latin speculationem (nominative speculatio) “contemplation, observation,” noun of action from Latin speculatus, past participle of speculari “observe,” from specere “to look at, view”.   Meaning “pursuit of the truth by means of thinking” is from mid-15c. Disparaging sense of “mere conjecture” is recorded from 1570s. Meaning “buying and selling in search of profit from rise and fall of market value” is recorded from 1774; short form spec is attested from 1794.
[vi] contemplative: ( adjective) 1. expressing or involving prolonged thought. [synonyms: thoughtful, pensive, reflective, meditative, musing, ruminative, introspective, brooding, deep/lost in thought, in a brown study]; 2.involving or given to deep silent prayer or religious meditation. 3. a person whose life is devoted primarily to prayer, esp. in a monastery or convent.
[vii] The Coaches Coach: Drawing Distinctions – Freemasonry and Masonry; Dr. John S. Nagy (2014)
[viii] speculativism: the excessive use of speculation.
[ix] operative: (adjective) 1. functioning; having effect. [synonyms: in force, in operation, in effect, valid]; [antonyms: invalid]; 2.(of a word) having the most relevance or significance in a phrase or sentence. [synonyms: key, significant, relevant, applicable, pertinent, apposite, germane, crucial, critical, pivotal, central, essential]; [antonyms: irrelevant]; 3. of or relating to surgery.; (noun) 1. a worker, esp. a skilled one in a manufacturing industry.; [synonyms: machinist, (machine) operator, mechanic, engineer, worker, workman, blue-collar worker]; 2. a private detective or secret agent; [synonyms: agent, secret agent, undercover agent, spy, mole, plant, double agent; (archaic) intelligencer]; 3. detective, private detective, investigator, private investigator, sleuth;
Origin: late Middle English: from late Latin operativus, from Latin operat- ‘done by labor,’ from the verb operari
[x] operative (noun) “worker, operator,” 1809, from operative (adj.); sense of “secret agent, spy” is first attested 1930, probably from its use by the Pinkerton Detective Agency as a title for their private detectives (1905).
 (adjective) “producing the intended effect,” early 15c., from Old French operatif (14c.) or directly from Late Latin operativus “creative, formative,” from operat-, past participle stem of operari. Weakened sense of “significant, important” is from 1955.
[xi] operate (verb) c.1600, "to be in effect," back-formation from operation, or else from Latin operatus, past participle of operari "to work, labor, toil, take pains" (in Late Latin "to have effect, be active, cause"). Surgical sense is first attested 1799. Meaning "to work machinery" is from 1864 in American English.
[xii]Which is preceded by “We work as Speculative Masons only…” with few Brothers realizing that the words “work” and “operate” are synonyms, inferring that they must be Operative in their Speculative Practice.
[xiii] And as the operative workman erects his temporal building in accordance with the designs laid down upon the trestle board, by the master workman, so should we, both operative and speculative, endeavor to erect our spiritual building in accordance with the designs laid down by the Supreme Architect of the universe, in his great book of nature and revelation, which is our spiritual, moral and masonic trestle board.

Monday, March 31, 2014

A Brother Asks... What does Freeborn mean?



A Brother Asks:  Does the word "freeborn" mean "not born a slave"?

My Response: No.  It most certainly does not mean that and it never did.  But there are some extremely ignorant people in the world who would like others to believe this rubbish and perhaps for immoral purposes.

Brother:  But doesn't the word "Freeborn" mean "Born Free"? 

Coach: No.  It does not and never did.

Brother: Please, explain this!

Coach: The word "Freeborn" was originally used to explain the phrase "Able of Birth" and it had nothing to do with Slavery or Bondage. That was covered by the term "bondman" and "bondsman" which only applied to the Fellow Crafts who wanted to join, since they were of the age of consent.  Pre-apprentices by their very nature were under the age of consent making them chattel to their father or guardian.  Pre-apprentices being a slave was never addressed because they were already considered bonded to someone due to their being underage.

Brother: That makes sense!  Then with what does "able of birth" have to do?

Coach: It had everything to do with being "Superior or Excellent Stock" at birth.


Brother: What does that mean?

Coach: Its true meaning? 

Brother: Yes!

Coach: The word "Freeborn", and its variations "Free-Born" and "Free Born", all originally meant "excellent or superior birth" and referred to a person being of "superior breeding" and hence great potential, from the very beginning of whatever they are to engage in!

Brother: That's it?

Coach: No, it is often thought this meant "royalty" or "nobility" only, but it is not limited to this meaning.



Brother: How so?

Coach: Context is everything! And in this case, especially when the context of the original manuscripts using the word "freeborn" as it referenced the stock it should accept into Stonecraft organizations were trying to use the term to explain "Able of Birth".

Brother: Stock?

Coach: Yes!  It is anyone born who is believed to be "superior or excellent stock" at birth (as in: from the very beginning).  This characteristic is what Fellow Crafts looked for in what they examined for they would never want to start out with an apprentice who could never reach the potential of a Fellow Craft due to training inferior stock (as in: any one who could NEVER reach the potentials required of them).


Brother: Wow!  I can see how such character is exactly what members would want in their candidates.


Coach: Exactly!  Okay, so now that you know this, how are you going to proceed with this information? Please do tell!
 
For Further Light:




F&S,

Brother John S. Nagy

SOURCE: Chapter VII "Able" from "Building Free Men - Uncommonly Freeing Masonic Education - Volume 8", found here: http://www.coach.net/BuildingFreeMen.htm
Found here:



Thursday, February 20, 2014

The Coaches Coach: Masonic Cement -- Uncommon Education Video G.L.O.R.


Good Day My Fellow Travelers,

Here's a presentation on Masonic Cement based upon my book, "Building Cement - Uncommonly Concrete Masonic Education - Volume 7", that I did for the Georgia Lodge of Research on January 31, 2014 that might be of interest to you. 

WARNING: YOU MIGHT HAVE TO START THE VIDEO AND THEN REWIND TO THE BEGINNING.
 
Fraternally and Sincerely,

Bro. John S. Nagy
Building Better Builders Series Author



For more information related to this, other works, and Uncommon Masonic Support, please visit my website.

.




Thursday, February 6, 2014

Excerpt from: The Master’s New Works*



Excerpt from: The Master’s New Works*


The noble supporters who were to carry his works stooped low and reached for the floor as if they were picking up his efforts. Then they pretended ever so gallantly to lift and hold them high for all to see. They didn't dare admit they had nothing to hold. That would show them and their efforts for what they were.

So off went the Master in procession under his splendid canopy. Everyone in the lodge and the anti-rooms said, "Oh, how fine are the Master’s new works! Don't they complement him to perfection? And see his completed undertakings!"

Nobody would dare confess that he couldn't see anything, for that would prove him either unfit for his position, or a fool.

So they shouted in unison, "No work the Master had done before was ever such a complete success as these".
 

"But he hasn't done anything", a young Brother said.
 

"Did you ever hear such innocent prattle?" said his mentor. And one Brother whispered to another what the young Brother had said, "He hasn't anything done. A young Brother says the Master hasn't anything done."
 

"But he hasn't anything done!" the whole Lodge cried out at last.
 

The Master shivered, for he knew they were right. But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noble supporters held high the works that weren’t there at all.
...

F&S,


Brother John S Nagy 

 * With MAJOR and SINCERE Apologies to Hans Christian Andersen


Sunday, January 26, 2014

The Coaches Coach: Drawing Distinctions – Freemasonry and Masonry


Good Day My Fellow Travelers,

Here's an article that I wrote last month that might be of interest to you.

Fraternally and Sincerely,

Bro. John S. Nagy
Building Better Builders Series Author

For more information related to this and other articles, please visit my website.

--------------------------

The Coaches Coach: Drawing Distinctions – Freemasonry and Masonry

 Your Pass-ability is determined by your capacity to Linguistically Discriminate.  Don’t prove your Brothers wrong in their Passing assessment of you by acting otherwise.

As with the word “Cowan[i]”, which has changed in its application within the Craft far from its original meaning[ii], “Masonry” and “Freemasonry” are defined within the Craft with decidedly specific meanings that simply do not reveal the entire semantic picture to those with closed eyes.  There is no doubt whatsoever that the two words are used interchangeably by many Brothers and even by those who are held to be Craft Scholars.  And just as with the word, “Cowan”, one must not suckle solely from the Freemasonic teat if one wants to be a well-nourished Brother.

))))))

There have been some interesting reactions from Brothers around the globe as to my use of the words “Freemason”, “Freemasonry”, “Freemasonic”, “Mason”, “Masonry” and “Masonic”.  Some Brothers emphatically agree with the distinctions and applications that I’ve put forth when using these words.  On the other hand, I’ve also been accused of a variety of things that run the gamut from making things up and inventing definitions to novel use and blatant misuse.  Trying to glean more insight, some have also asked if I am referring to Operative[iii],[iv] and Speculative[v],[vi] Masonry when I draw distinctions; I am not.  These are totally different directions.

In engaging in these conversations, I’ve shared that I have not done any of these things of which I am accused and have simply read the available materials both inside and outside the Craft, and have concluded that the distinctions exist and can be easily seen, if one looks for them and therefore what I offer only appears to be made up, invented, novel and misused by those who have not taken the time to think beyond the pale, as I and others have. 

I was eventually asked what academic scholars I have drawn my conclusions from and if they support my conclusions.  My only steadfast response to this and other questions that relate to this query is that I see the differences and distinctions throughout the literature I’ve reviewed and, what’s more, I am not alone in my observations and conclusions.  All one has to do is ask oneself a simple question: What does each word point toward consistently and only sometimes inconsistently?  Once this is done, the picture begins to come into focus.

Gestation

As for me, the distinction between the two started quickening when I realized that innovations to Freemasonry occurred all the time, even though it was clearly stated that no man or body of men could make any innovations[vii] to Masonry whatsoever.  This puzzled me to no end since the two statements appeared to contradict each other. After much contemplation, it was clear that for the two to be reconciled, the writers were obviously not assigning the same meaning to the words “Freemasonry” and “Masonry”.  This had me thinking: how could this difference be further researched?  There must be a reason!

Masonry

In my quest, one of the rabbit holes I crawled down was the etymology of “Masonry”. It became very clear that the root of the word, “Masonry[viii]” is “Mason”.  And furthermore, the root of the word, “Mason[ix],[x]” is “to make”.  With a little bit of well thought out Speculation[xi] and even well founded reasoning, it’s easy to conclude that Masonry is about “making things”. In essence, Masons are Builders. 

Coincidently, this conclusion dovetails perfectly with the Freemasonic slogan, “Masonry Makes Good Men Better” that has been in circulation for quite some time.   Please note though that it is not “Freemasonry” and “Freemasons” that do this.  It is the “Purposeful Practice of Masonry” that men apply toward themselves that “makes” them Better.  This also echoes the sentiments voiced by many men* who joined the Fraternity and they specifically state their intention: To Improve myself in Masonry (not Freemasonry.)

But, I digress. 

Freemasonry

Applying the same methodology toward the word, “Freemasonry[xii],[xiii]” and related words such as, “Freemason[xiv],[xv]” and “Freemasonic”, it becomes clear that schisms exist in how the word was thought to have come about.  Some sources[xvi] claimed Free-Masons were Masons who worked freestones and the word eventually merged through common use.  Others claimed that these were merely free men who were also Masons.  Still others claimed that it was only through their association with a guild that these Masons were free to travel, work, earn and contribute.  And yet there are some who state just the opposite: that this applied to Masons who are free from the constraints of guilds and lords.  It’s all very confusing!

One thing stands out though.  No matter what the conjecture is to its origins, the one thing that remains clearly obvious is that the current day use of the word is specific:  To be called a “Freemason”, one must belong to a duly Recognized Organization and, furthermore, one does not require anything more from oneself than this legitimate association to wear this label.  A Freemason does not have to Build anything whatsoever, he does not have to Speculate in any way and he does not even have to do anything other than pay his dues on time and be moral in his actions; he only has to be an accepted member.   In essence, Freemasons are Members. 

The Delivery

To engage in Masonry, one must both Speculate[xvii] and Operate, and in that order if one desires to have any modicum of success.  To engage in Freemasonry, only Operation is required; although engaging in Speculation would certainly make one’s efforts more beneficial.

Furthermore, to Improve oneself in Masonry, one must engage in activities associated with Improvement; this means engaging in both Speculation and Operation; it is not enough for one to just think about it, one must actually apply oneself toward improving ends! 

This does not mean involving oneself in mindlessly memorization and regurgitation of things to which one has no understanding whatsoever or to accept that one has no truly informed person to ask if one had an interest in understanding in what one was engaged.  This also does not mean adhering without question to an Organizational Digest of Law to which, by law, only one person has any authority to interpret and provide rulings and decisions based upon his sole interpretation. These have very little to do with Building or Improvements.

 To Improve oneself requires a steadfast development plan that starts with one’s heart, works toward one’s head and eventually ends up cultivating one’s spirit.  This is Building; this is Masonry. 

None of this is required to be labeled “a Freemason” or to participate in Freemasonry.  But should you actually decode Freemasonic Ritual, it shall become clear as to what you must do to Improve, and it involves Building! 
Future Hopes

Yes, it is very clear that there are overlaps in the word use by both scholar and non-scholar, especially within the Craft by Brothers who view Masonry and Freemasonry to be synonymous.  However, there exists a select few who look at their use of these words as separate and distinct with sincere hopes that some day it shall be truly very difficult to see any difference between them whatsoever, inside and outside the Craft.
  • Freemasons hear & see Solomon; Masons hear & see Wisdom.
  • Freemasons hear & see King Hiram; Masons hear & see Strength.
  • Freemasons hear & see Hiram Abiff; Masons... hear & see Beauty.
  • Freemasons hear & see Working Tools; Masons hear & see Transformation.
  • Freemasons hear & see Obligation; Masons hear & see Opportunity.
  • Freemasons hear & see Ritual; Masons hear & see Direction.
  • Freemasons hear & see Members; Masons hear & see Brothers.
  • Freemasons hear & see Lodge; Masons hear & see Family.
What pairs do you hear & see?

Points to Perpend
1)      What distinctions do your see between the words in question?
2)     What Ritual, Lecture and Historic examples support your conclusions?
3)     What nurturing difference do these conclusions make for you?
4)     Does your involvement in the Craft lean more toward Masonry or Freemasonry?
--------------------------------------

Dr. John S. Nagy is a Master Mason, Lodge Musician and Masonic Education provider for multiple Lodges and for others who support his sharing.  He is author of the “Building Series” of Uncommon Masonic Education books.  His seven books: Building Hiram, Building Boaz, Building Athens, Building Janus, Building Perpends, Building Ruffish, and Building Cement, his videos: “The Coaches Coach: Building Builders” Parts 1 & 2 and his Uncommon Masonic Education Workshops cover aspects of Masonry designed to Build Better Builders.  His materials are used to instruct Blue Lodge, Scottish Rite and York Rite Candidates in Symbol Recognition, Understanding and Application.   You can find out more about him, his books, his videos and his workshops through his webpage at:  http://www.coach.net/BuildingBuilders.htm
------------------------------------------- 

[i] From the Gaelic root word for “hollow; indent”; Chapter XII, The Hole Story, from Building Ruffish; Chapter XII, The Dry-Dykers, from Building Cement; Dr. John S. Nagy
[ii] Freemen and Cowan, Ars Quatuor Coronatorum Volume XXI (1908)
[iii] operative (n.) [etymology] "worker, operator," 1809, from operative (adj.); sense of "secret agent, spy" is first attested 1930, probably from its use by the Pinkerton Detective Agency as a title for their private detectives (1905).  operative (adj.) [etymology] "producing the intended effect," early 15c., from Old French operatif (14c.) or directly from Late Latin operativus "creative, formative," from operat-, past participle stem of operari (see operation). Weakened sense of "significant, important" is from 1955.
[iv] operative (n.)/1. a person engaged, employed, or skilled in some branch of work, especially productive or industrial work; worker. 2. a detective. 3. a secret agent; spy. (adj.) 4. operating, or exerting force, power, or influence. 5. having force; being in effect or operation: laws operative in this city. 6. effective or efficacious. 7. engaged in, concerned with, or pertaining to work or productive activity. 8. significant; key: The operative word in that sentence is “sometimes.” Origin: 1590–1600;  < Middle French operatif  < Latin operāt ( us ) (see operate) + Middle French -if -ive  synonyms: 1. workman, factory hand. 2. investigator, agent. 6. effectual, serviceable. (adj.)1.  in force, effect, or operation 2. exerting force or influence  3. producing a desired effect; significant: the operative word 4. of or relating to a surgical procedure (n.) 5. a worker, esp one with a special skill 6. ( US ) a private detective 
[v] speculative (adj.) [etymology] late 14c., "contemplative," also "purely scientific, in theory only" (opposed to practical), from Old French speculatif "worth great attention; theoretical," or directly from Late Latin speculativus, from past participle stem of speculari (see speculation). Meaning "given to (financial) speculation" is from 1763. Related: Speculatively.
[vi] speculative (adj.) 1. pertaining to, of the nature of, or characterized by speculation, contemplation, conjecture, or abstract reasoning: a speculative approach. 2. theoretical, rather than practical: speculative conclusions. 3. given to speculation, as persons, the mind, etc. 4. of the nature of or involving commercial or financial speculation: speculative ventures. 5. engaging in or given to such speculation.
[vii] Landmark 25: That the landmarks of Masonry can never be changed.  These constitute the landmarks, or as they have sometimes been called, "the body of Masonry," in which it is not in the power of man or a body of men to make the least innovation.
[viii] masonry (n.) [etymology] "stonework," mid-14c., from Old French maçonerie (14c.), from maçon (see mason).
[ix] mason (n.) [etymology] c.1200, "stoneworker" (as a surname, early 12c.), from Old French masson, maçon "stone mason" (Old North French machun), probaby from Frankish *makjo or some other Germanic source (cf. Old High German steinmezzo "stone mason," Modern German Steinmetz, second element related to mahhon "to make;" see make (v.)). But it also might be from, or influenced by, Medieval Latin machio, matio (7c.) which is said by Isidore to be derived from machina (see machine). The medieval word also might be from the root of Latin maceria "wall." Meaning "a Freemason" is attested from early 15c. in Anglo-French.
[x] mason (n.) 1. a person whose trade is building with units of various natural or artificial mineral products, as stones, bricks, cinder blocks, or tiles, usually with the use of mortar or cement as a bonding agent; a builder.  2. a person who dresses stones or bricks. 3. ( initial capital letter as in Mason) a Freemason. verb (used with object) 4. to construct of or strengthen with masonry. Origin: 1175–1225; Middle English machun, mason  < Old French machun, masson  < Frankish *makjon  maker, derivative of *makōn  to make1
[xi] speculation (n.) late 14c., "intelligent contemplation, consideration; act of looking," from Old French speculacion "close observation, rapt attention," and directly from Late Latin speculationem (nominative speculatio) "contemplation, observation," noun of action from Latin speculatus, past participle of speculari "observe," from specere "to look at, view".  Meaning "pursuit of the truth by means of thinking" is from mid-15c. Disparaging sense of "mere conjecture" is recorded from 1570s. Meaning "buying and selling in search of profit from rise and fall of market value" is recorded from 1774; short form spec is attested from 1794.
[xii] freemasonry (n.) [etymology] mid-15c., from freemason + -ry. 
[xiii] freemasonry (n.)/ 1. secret or tacit brotherhood; fellowship; fundamental bond or rapport: the freemasonry of those who hunger for knowledge. 2. ( initial capital letter ) the principles, practices, and institutions of Freemasons. Origin: 1400–50; late Middle English fremasonry.  See Freemason, -ry
[xiv] freemason (n.) [etymology] late 14c., originally a traveling guild of masons with a secret code; in the early 17c. they began accepting honorary members and teaching them the secrets and lore, which by 1717 had developed into the fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons.
[xv] freemason (n.) 1. a member of a widely distributed secret order (Free and Accepted Masons)  having for its object mutual assistance and the promotion of brotherly love among its members. 2. ( lowercase ) History/Historical . a. one of a class of skilled stoneworkers of the Middle Ages, possessing secret signs and passwords. b. a member of a society composed of such workers, which also included honorary members (accepted masons) not connected with the building trades.  Origin: 1350–1400; Middle English fremason.  See free, mason Related forms: freemasonic /
[xvi] The exact origin of the free- is a subject of dispute. Some [e.g. Klein] see a corruption of French frère "brother," from frèremaçon "brother mason;" others say it was because the masons worked on "free-standing" stones; still others see them as "free" from the control of local guilds or lords [OED].
[xvii] speculate (v) [etymology] 1590s, "view mentally, contemplate" (transitive), back-formation from speculation. Also formerly "view as from a watchtower" (1610s). Intransitive sense of "pursue truth by conjecture or thinking" is from 1670s. Meaning "to invest money upon risk for the sake of profit" is from 1785.

* originally this read "each and every man" instead of "many men" but, as has already been pointed out, innovation to Ritual has changed this too.